Jack, Shel's got a point here. Your comment is obtuse in the extreme. Clear commentary would distinctly help.
-Adam Jack Davis wrote: > You may find faining misunderstanding easier than defending your work. > If so, enough said. > > Jack > > --- Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>No, I don't understand what you mean ... I often don't understand >>your >>comments, jack. "Film over the image?" What are you trying to say? >>Lack >>of contrast? Muddy? Colors of low saturation? Not bright enough? >>Not >>sharp enough? What do you mean by "check the mugger person's mocha?" >> Is >>that a joke, or do you mean something more? Sorry Jack, you're not >>being >>precise enough for me to understand you. >> >>Shel >> >> >> >> >>>[Original Message] >>>From: Jack Davis >> >>>I'm certain you "understand" the words. Your point has to be that >> >>you >> >>>just don't agree with them. Right? >>> >>>Jack >>> >>>--- Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>I don't understand your comments, but thank you for commenting. >>>> >>>>Shel >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>[Original Message] >>>>>From: Jack Davis >>>> >>>>>Honestly appears to have a sort of film over the image. >>>>>Makes me want to clean my glasses. >>>>>Best check the mugger person's mocha. >>>> >>>>istDS, A50/1.4 @ F/2.8, ISO 3200, 1/40 sec >>>>http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/zocalao.html >> >> >> >>-- >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>[email protected] >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
