Jack, you're such a pill.  I don't "feign" ignorance ... don't have to
<LOL>  You'll note that Paul and Godders made comments that I could
understand.  They commented in photographic terms that meant something to
me, were precise wrt what they meant, and suggested possible ways to fix
what they saw.  While I don't expect you to be as knowledgeable as either
of them, simple photographic terms like contrast, hue, saturation, curves,
and the like, should, by now, be second nature to you.  You've been
photographing for quite some time, and have been on this list long enough,
to be able to explain what you see, and make criticisms or offer
suggestions in a way that others can more readily understand you.

Not only do I frequently not understand you, but when I ask for an
explanation or a clarification of what you said or meant, you respond with
some wise ass remark as you did here.  This is the second or third time
you've done that after I asked for more info from you.



Shel



> [Original Message]
> From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
> You may find faining misunderstanding easier than defending your work.
> If so, enough said.
>
> Jack 
>
> --- Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > No, I don't understand what you mean ... I often don't understand
> > your
> > comments, jack.  "Film over the image?"  What are you trying to say? 
> > Lack
> > of contrast?  Muddy?  Colors of low saturation?  Not bright enough? 
> > Not
> > sharp enough?  What do you mean by "check the mugger person's mocha?"
> >  Is
> > that a joke, or do you mean something more?  Sorry Jack, you're not
> > being
> > precise enough for me to understand you.
> > 
> > Shel
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > [Original Message]
> > > From: Jack Davis 
> > 
> > > I'm certain you "understand" the words. Your point has to be that
> > you
> > > just don't agree with them. Right?
> > >
> > > Jack
> > >
> > > --- Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I don't understand your comments, but thank you for commenting.
> > > > 
> > > > Shel
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > [Original Message]
> > > > > From: Jack Davis 
> > > > 
> > > > > Honestly appears to have a sort of film over the image. 
> > > > > Makes me want to clean my glasses. 
> > > > > Best check the mugger person's mocha.
> > > > 
> > > > istDS, A50/1.4 @ F/2.8, ISO 3200, 1/40 sec 
> > > > http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/zocalao.html
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > [email protected]
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > 
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to