Note the filter on Erwitt's lens ...  Didn't Leica use Jim Marshall's
camera in some ads or promotional material as well?

There's something so very beautiful about a well-brassed black-bodied
camera.

Shel



> [Original Message]
> From: Bob W 

> Those black paint jobs look great don't they? I think Leica have used
> Erwitt's camera on some of their adverts and posters. 
>
> I've been trying to find the ebay webpage of Victor Englebert's M2
> that I saved years ago, but it seems to have disappeared from my
> machine. That was a great collectible too. 
>
> --
> Cheers,
>  Bob 
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
> > Behalf Of Shel Belinkoff
> > Sent: 28 August 2006 07:23
> > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > Subject: Re: Digital Leica M8?
> > 
> > Indeed ...
> > 
> > Some real "collectible" Leicas:
> > 
> > Elliott Erwitt's M3: 
> > http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/display/1941882/channel/4
> > 
> > Gary Winogrand's last M4:
> > http://www.cameraquest.com/LeicaM4G.htm
> > 
> > Jim Marshall's M4:
> > http://photo.net/bboard/big-image?bboard_upload_id=20693984
> > 
> > My Leicas are 40+ years old.  The M3 has had one CLA, the M2 
> > has had two,
> > the second only because I had it modified and, as long as it 
> > was in the
> > shop, it seemed a good idea to go through it, especially 
> > since it had been
> > a l-o-n-g time since its previous CLA.  Interestingly, both 
> > cameras tested
> > within spec even before their most recent CLA experiences.
> > 
> > I also had a 1934 Leica - it was 70 years old and still 
> > worked perfectly
> > when someone made me an offer on it that I couldn't refuse ;-))
> > 
> > Shel
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > [Original Message]
> > > From: William Robb
> > 
> > > Something to consider in buying a Leica is the cost per 
> > exposure before 
> > > the camera wears out.
> > > >From what I have heard, Leica is the least expensive 
> > camera to use if 
> > > one takes a lot of pictures.
> > > Apparently, they don't wear out.
> > > This would probably be of little interest to a collector.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > [email protected]
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > 
> > 
> > 
>
>
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to