I agree with you about the lower third, but I think the rest of of it is fine as it is. It wouldn't hurt it to move the frame a little to the right, but I don't think it's necessary because the size of the tree provides enough balance for the house.
-- Cheers, Bob > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Joseph Tainter > Sent: 03 September 2006 17:10 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Photography (for a change) > > This is a question about composition. I came across the > following photo > (not mine): > > http://www.zyeuter.com/bon_baiser_de_valensole/photo107872.html > > There is much about it that I like, but I think that the > bottom third is > a mistake. It seems to me that the photographer should have > cut off the > bottom third, then extended the composition somewhat to the right (if > possible--maybe there's a cement plant there), placing the > building at > the upper-left "golden rectangle" point. > > What do others think? Is there justification for keeping the > lower third? > > Joe > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
