I was going to bring quite a bit of equipment to GFM as well. Hell, I  
was planning on driving out there. So why not load up the Jeep? I'll  
try to make it this year, and I'll be loaded for bear-- or at least  
chipmunk:-).
Paul
On Sep 5, 2006, at 7:20 PM, cbwaters wrote:

> I'll admit it.  I don't see the point of this thread.
>
> I took almost all of my modest collection to GFM.  Partly to show  
> off (as
> if), partly because I enjoy shooting with all my cameras.  Partly  
> because I
> thought somebody might like a chance to fondle one or two of them,  
> having
> never had the opportunity to see that particular model before.
>
> OTOH, I took only my *ist-D and a 28-105 with me on a family hike  
> in the
> woods on Monday...
>
> So tell me, what's the point?
>
> CW
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 6:34 PM
> Subject: RE: the way it was ... the way it is (was: amusing product  
> review)
>
>
>> Oh, you'll get no disagreement from me on that point.  OTOH, based  
>> on the
>> equipment list posted by some GFM attendees, and the gear I've seen
>> various
>> PDMLers take for a few hours of local shooting on one of our NorCal
>> meetings, there is definitely a point of overkill.
>> Capa shot an entire war with less gear than some people bring on a  
>> days
>> outing.  Erwitt's travelling equipment case of 35mm gear - the one  
>> he took
>> when on assignment - contained less gear than some people take for a
>> weekend stroll in the woods. I think you have the same photo I do  
>> of that
>> case.
>>
>> But, the real point is that, for me and some others - yourself  
>> included -
>> carryig lap tops, CD burners, poratble hydroelectric generators,  
>> satellite
>> uplinks, and so on and on are not only wasteful of space but often  
>> useless
>> in many situations.
>>
>> And, considering the prevelance of zoom lenses these days, you can  
>> often
>> get by with only two or three lenses.
>>
>> What some of the people here are missing is the point that many  
>> photogs
>> when travelling, are travelling to places where it's difficult to  
>> recharge
>> batteries, where lap tops are useless without portable generators,  
>> and
>> where it may be difficult to find an internet cafe that allow you  
>> to burn
>> CD's.
>>
>> Shel
>> "The smallest feline is a masterpiece"  - Leonardo da Vinci
>>
>>
>>
>>> [Original Message]
>>> From: Bob W
>>
>>> One of the important things is to try and eliminate show-stoppers  
>>> and,
>>> as far as reasonable, single points of failure. It's therefore  
>>> wise to
>>> have at least 2 bodies and a set of lenses with some overlap in  
>>> their
>>> range of focal lengths.
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.7/437 - Release Date:  
>> 9/4/2006
>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to