16-50/2.8 is said to be about 1000 dollars. 2006/9/12, Mike Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > What is the purpose of a weather sealed body without any sealed > lenses? I imagine that the two upcoming lenses (16-50/2.8 being one) > will be weather sealed. If so, that's going to be an expensive lens, > given the super-sonic motor and fast aperture... Perhaps Pentax's > most expensive zoom? Pentax has typically produced high priced primes > (A* and FA*, FA Limiteds), but not really the expensive zooms (barr > the 24-90 and a couple of FA* zooms). > > Is my reasoning correct? > > Mike > -- > Remember to Breathe -- MichaelHamilton.ca > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >
-- Thibault Massart aka Thibouille ---------------------- *ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ... -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
