Ah, I wondered about that. There is no chance of me
getting a darkroom at this point. I don't have my own
house. But having the (albeit chromogenic) prints now
would be good. And then, at some stage, I would like a
darkroom in my own house (along with white picket
fence & rose garden). So I would like to be able to
dig my negatives out and play with them at a later
date.

On a slightly different tangent. I have all these B&W
negatives from school photography. There just wasn't
enough hours in the school year to get them all
printed. I went into a lab a few years back, and they
said to print them from negatives, I would have to pay
about NZ$1 per print just to get normal size prints.
This seems quite a lot, and would end up costing more
I think than D&P. So then I was wondering about
scanning negatives into my computer. I have HP Scanjet
3300C. Any point in trying to use this, or will I just
ruin my negs and my scanner? I don't think my scanner
gets hot through normal use. Or would it maybe be
better to get a copy centre to scan them onto CD for
me? Is this likely to be cheaper than prints from
negative? And is it safe for my negatives?

Also, how good are prints made onto photo-quality
paper using an inkjet printer and HP photo cartridges?
I imagine not as good as ones you print yourself in
the darkroom, but am I likely to be disappointed? I
have not shelled out megabucks for the paper and
cartridge yet.

Thanks in advance,
Jody.

--- tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It sounds to me as if she's saying she just wants to
> play around with b+w 
> to see if she likes it. Chromogenics are perfect for
> that.
> Anyway, they're very nice films when printed on b+w
> paper.


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
http://im.yahoo.com
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to