Shel, The K1000D has likely not been designed yet. And it could always use parts from the MZ-M.
-Adam Shel Belinkoff wrote: > Give it up, Peter ... no aperture simulator will be forthcoming. Even if > pentax wanted to use it, it would require a redesign of the camera, not the > thing to be doing when you want to _lower_ the cost and selling price. > > Shel > > > > >>[Original Message] >>From: P. J. Alling >>Heck, I'm hoping the K1000D drops all the fripperies, has an aperture >>simulator and no autofocus motor at all. >> >>John Francis wrote: > > >>>After that I'd see a K1000D as a good candidate - it would >>>be pretty close to a K100D, after all; perhaps no more than >>>dropping the picture modes (and slimming filters :-), and >>>probably losing the on-board flash (as the MZ-M did). > > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
