Rob, you're a hoot. First you complain that the Pentax offerings  
aren't good enough. Now, you're complaining that they're too good. HAR!

On Sep 14, 2006, at 10:48 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:

> On 15/09/06, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Sheesh, for now take some pleasure and pride in what Pentax is  
>> trying to do
>> here, that the camera is ore a leader than anything Pentax has  
>> produced in
>> a long time, accept that the company may never really compete with  
>> Canon in
>> terms of numbers, enjoy the concept of forwards and backwards lens
>> compatibility, check out the camera when it arrives in your area, and
>> decide if it's worthwhile for you.
>
> It's the likely excessive demand that they are creating that has me
> worried, the price point has got people from all aver the place
> interested. The point is that they can't compete with Canon numbers,
> we all know this.
>
> -- 
> Rob Studdert
> HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
> Tel +61-2-9554-4110
> UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/
> Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to