Thanks Tom,

The irony is that I'd just smacked you for this yesterday. And I must 
apologize for it.

-Adam


Tom C wrote:
> Really know ones complaining.  That's the trouble with half you guys on the 
> list that label people whiners and complainers.
> 
> Someone expresses a CONCERN, and because it's not your CONCERN, you start 
> throwing around epithets and getting abusive.
> 
> Some of you also tend to call someone who looks at things from two points of 
> view negative when they voice and give expression to the negative side of 
> things, often totally ignoring the positive comments they made.
> 
> FWIW, I agree we have no idea what the Pentax supply will be and whether 
> they will be able to keep up with demand.   Time will tell.  I expect they 
> will, othewise they would be foolishly throwing away sales, or otherwise 
> PO'ing prospective customers.
> 
> 
> 
> Tom C.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>>From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>>Subject: Re: popphoto.com k10D
>>Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 20:02:05 -0700
>>
>>I don't understand all the negativism and skepticism either.
>>Complaints about problems which exist only in speculation is really
>>stupid.
>>
>>I'm quite excited about the new body: by the specs it has everything
>>I'd like. I'm sure I'll be able to deal with any minor issues that
>>come up with it. No camera I've owned previously has been perfect
>>either.
>>
>>Let's let the thing come to be and then objectively assess what it
>>does or doesn't do.
>>
>>Godfrey
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>[email protected]
>>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to