Clamoring? I have to get up off the floor.... OK, I'm back. I recall everyone defending Pentax's decision to keep on making 6MP bodies. I remember people telling all about the beautiful prints they get with a 6MP camera. I remember people suggesting that a higher MP body would have more noise and that the file sizes would be harder to deal with.
What you failed to notice is that I didn't say anything bad about 6MP cameras. Tom C. >From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: popphoto.com k10D >Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 15:44:44 -0400 > >That's the biggest crock of BS I've ever seen on the list. We've all >been clamoring for a higher resolution camera for a long time. I >would say it's unanimous. On the other hand, many of us did point out >that the 6 MP cameras worked very well. There's a difference that you >apparently don't understand. >Paul >On Sep 15, 2006, at 12:30 PM, Tom C wrote: > > > I've got emails saved from 3 months back when a lot of you guys were > > ridiculing me for wanting more than a 6MP DSLR and saying I thought > > it was > > foolish for Pentax to continue making them, and how you were > > TOTALLY HAPPY > > and SATISFIED with your 6MP Pentax. Now your all in line to buy a > > new one! > > > > *IF* Pentax Japan actually listens to this list and takes seriously > > the > > views expressed here (which I highly doubt), then you actually owe > > all the > > 'negative', 'whining', ' Chicken Little's' on this list a 'Thank > > you' for > > theor voice, because otherwise you'd convince Pentax to kep on > > churning out > > more of the same. > > > > Now, that's a hoot. > > > > Tom C. > > > > > >> From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > >> Subject: Re: popphoto.com k10D > >> Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 23:05:46 -0400 > >> > >> Rob, you're a hoot. First you complain that the Pentax offerings > >> aren't good enough. Now, you're complaining that they're too good. > >> HAR! > >> > >> On Sep 14, 2006, at 10:48 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote: > >> > >>> On 15/09/06, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Sheesh, for now take some pleasure and pride in what Pentax is > >>>> trying to do > >>>> here, that the camera is ore a leader than anything Pentax has > >>>> produced in > >>>> a long time, accept that the company may never really compete with > >>>> Canon in > >>>> terms of numbers, enjoy the concept of forwards and backwards lens > >>>> compatibility, check out the camera when it arrives in your > >>>> area, and > >>>> decide if it's worthwhile for you. > >>> > >>> It's the likely excessive demand that they are creating that has me > >>> worried, the price point has got people from all aver the place > >>> interested. The point is that they can't compete with Canon numbers, > >>> we all know this. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Rob Studdert > >>> HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > >>> Tel +61-2-9554-4110 > >>> UTC(GMT) +10 Hours > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ > >>> Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 > >>> > >>> -- > >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >> > >> > >> -- > >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >> [email protected] > >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >[email protected] >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
