My point is largely this: I am amazed by the strenuous defense of Pentax (by some) when 6MP is all they had to offer, juxtaposed by the instant desire to abandon 6MP when Pentax has better.
I understand the 2nd part, but not the first. Tom C. >From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: popphoto.com k10D >Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 16:25:05 -0400 > >Dig away. >On Sep 15, 2006, at 3:53 PM, Tom C wrote: > > > > > Why was I riduculed then? You want me to dig them out? > > > > > > Tom C. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > >> Subject: Re: popphoto.com k10D > >> Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 15:44:44 -0400 > >> > >> That's the biggest crock of BS I've ever seen on the list. We've all > >> been clamoring for a higher resolution camera for a long time. I > >> would say it's unanimous. On the other hand, many of us did point out > >> that the 6 MP cameras worked very well. There's a difference that you > >> apparently don't understand. > >> Paul > >> On Sep 15, 2006, at 12:30 PM, Tom C wrote: > >> > >>> I've got emails saved from 3 months back when a lot of you guys were > >>> ridiculing me for wanting more than a 6MP DSLR and saying I thought > >>> it was > >>> foolish for Pentax to continue making them, and how you were > >>> TOTALLY HAPPY > >>> and SATISFIED with your 6MP Pentax. Now your all in line to buy a > >>> new one! > >>> > >>> *IF* Pentax Japan actually listens to this list and takes seriously > >>> the > >>> views expressed here (which I highly doubt), then you actually owe > >>> all the > >>> 'negative', 'whining', ' Chicken Little's' on this list a 'Thank > >>> you' for > >>> theor voice, because otherwise you'd convince Pentax to kep on > >>> churning out > >>> more of the same. > >>> > >>> Now, that's a hoot. > >>> > >>> Tom C. > >>> > >>> > >>>> From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > >>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > >>>> Subject: Re: popphoto.com k10D > >>>> Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 23:05:46 -0400 > >>>> > >>>> Rob, you're a hoot. First you complain that the Pentax offerings > >>>> aren't good enough. Now, you're complaining that they're too good. > >>>> HAR! > >>>> > >>>> On Sep 14, 2006, at 10:48 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On 15/09/06, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Sheesh, for now take some pleasure and pride in what Pentax is > >>>>>> trying to do > >>>>>> here, that the camera is ore a leader than anything Pentax has > >>>>>> produced in > >>>>>> a long time, accept that the company may never really compete > >>>>>> with > >>>>>> Canon in > >>>>>> terms of numbers, enjoy the concept of forwards and backwards > >>>>>> lens > >>>>>> compatibility, check out the camera when it arrives in your > >>>>>> area, and > >>>>>> decide if it's worthwhile for you. > >>>>> > >>>>> It's the likely excessive demand that they are creating that > >>>>> has me > >>>>> worried, the price point has got people from all aver the place > >>>>> interested. The point is that they can't compete with Canon > >>>>> numbers, > >>>>> we all know this. > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Rob Studdert > >>>>> HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > >>>>> Tel +61-2-9554-4110 > >>>>> UTC(GMT) +10 Hours > >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>> http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ > >>>>> Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >>>>> [email protected] > >>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >>>> [email protected] > >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >> > >> > >> -- > >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >> [email protected] > >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >[email protected] >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
