Many of the lesser Vivitar lenses, especially the Kiron production, are MC too.
-Adam Paul Stenquist wrote: > But the Vivitar Series 1 is an entirely different animal. It's multi- > coated, although still not quite as good as Pentax coatings. > Paul > On Sep 17, 2006, at 7:25 AM, Tim Øsleby wrote: > > >>I have a Vivitar a A-28 f:2, mine is very prone to flare. I don't >>use it >>because of this. >> >> >>Tim >>Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) >> >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >>Behalf Of Paul >>Stenquist >>Sent: 17. september 2006 05:13 >>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>Subject: Re: 50/1.4 or 1.2 for the DSLR Bodies >> >>Hmm. I think I want the A28/2 as well. Much more practical than the >>Vivitar, although I wonder which is better. We may never know. >>Paul >>On Sep 16, 2006, at 11:01 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote: >> >> >>>Well, now I feel a little better - at least not so alone in my .... >>>foolishness. >>> >>>Shel >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>[Original Message] >>>>From: Digital Image Studio >>> >>>> Shel Belinkoff < >>> >>>>>I'd much prefer the SMCP-A 28/2.0 that, for some reason I >>>>>stupidly sold >>> >>>a >>> >>>>>year or so back. I found the 28/2.0 to be a bit soft at the >>>>>edges until >>>>>f4.0, but after that quite nice throughout the range. >>>> >>>>I had two A28/2 at one stage, it's a really nice lens to use, I sold >>>>it when I bought my 31LTD, wish I hadn't now. >>> >>> >>> >>>-- >>>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>[email protected] >>>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> >>-- >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>[email protected] >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> >> >> >> >>-- >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>[email protected] >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
