I understand, Dag. But since a went digital, I have taken 50-60 shots a day in average (two years 42.000+ digital photographs + some 120 and 35mm film). I dare not do the math as to what this would have cost me in film, development etc. I'd say in the neighbourhood of 10 times the price of the K10D body (more than 10000 USD)- film and development EXCLUSIVELY - no prints !!!!! I guess I'm addicted to photographing ... I no longer enjoy the exquisite luxury of making nice darkroom prints from 6x6 shots.
Do you know how pro's make nice photographs? They simply through away the bad ones! Regards Jens Bladt http://www.jensbladt.dk +45 56 63 77 11 +45 23 43 85 77 Skype: jensbladt248 -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af DagT Sendt: 20. september 2006 17:02 Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Emne: Re: K10D vs. Medium Format Den 20. sep. 2006 kl. 08.56 skrev Jens Bladt: > I am considering selling my MF ( 6x6) gear to help finance the K10D. > Does the new 10MP camera with 22 bit colour depth mean it's time to > ditch > the 120-roll film equipment? > Can I get the same image quality and resolution with the K10D? Resolution? Maybe. But not the limited DOF, soft of out focus areas, deep black tones of fiber based paper etc. MedF is a different world, I´ll keep both. DagT http://dag.foto.no Beware of internet links. You never know what is on the other side. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.5/451 - Release Date: 09/19/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.5/451 - Release Date: 09/19/2006 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
