Note that none of those can be set at shooting time, they can only be 
applied later (Dunno if they support RAW, but on the K100D it only 
supports JPEG).

-Adam

Tim Øsleby wrote:
> I just checked the specs. It does have a slimming filter. That's silly, yes.
> 
> 
> There are also B&W, Sephia, Color (whatever that means), Soft and
> Brightness. I can't imagine myself using them much, but it could be used as
> first steps towards some experimenting. I also imagine some of them to be
> practical when printing directly out of the camera. (Not that I'll ever do
> this).
> 
> Silly or not; what's wrong with some silliness? As long as it don't cost
> extra, or gets in the way for more "serious work".
> 
> 
> Tim
> Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
>  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shel
> Belinkoff
> Sent: 26. september 2006 07:24
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: What I'd LIke to See instead of Crap Features
> 
> I'm pretty sure it has a slimming filter. I know it has sepia and B&W and
> something to do with with color replacement or adjustment.  But those are
> just my ideas of silly filters.  Others may think them worthwhile, of
> course.
> 
> Shel
> 
> 
> 
> 
>>[Original Message]
>>From: Godfrey DiGiorgi 
> 
> 
>>Can't think of anything silly or useless in the K10D, but I'll be  
>>able to judge better when I have one to work with.
> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to