I didn't miss that fact Adam. It's just good to know that it's no worse at ISO 200 than my *istD.
Dave On 9/27/06, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Note that's at ISO 200 (Assuming the firmware is outputting good data, > unlike the Canadian samples). Noise had better be good at 200. > > -Adam > > > David Savage wrote: > > G'day Thibault, > > > > Thanks for the report & also for the sample DNG (opened fine for me > > using ACR & PS CS2 BTW) > > > > If the K10D's noise level is similar, or better, I'm impressed. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
