Because it cant be proved you idiot, just like you Cant prove its going to cost $200 like you mentioned Earlier.
Do you know how the aperture cam works? Its as Simple as a brick and the software math is about As basic as 2+2=4. This thing was in $100 complete cameras for years And years. They charge $100 retail for Anti-shake which is Far more complex than the stupid cam Sensor could ever be. If they charge $100 more for AS then it probably cost $20.00. I don't see your argument or proof of What the cam sensor cost, so why are you Asking me to provide proof? jco -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Robb Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 12:12 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: The JCO survey ----- Original Message ----- From: "J. C. O'Connell" Subject: RE: The JCO survey > "Pentax clearly believes" is not true. You don't know > why they did it. Alternative reasons include forcing > you to buy new lenses to get your basic lens functions back > that the body is disabling for only $5.00 in cost savings. > jco Why the frig else do you think they removed it? And where do you get this $5.00 number from? I keep asking you to prove your numbers, and you keep avoiding it. Why is this? William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
