"It is a tale told by an idiot, full of strength and fury, signifying nothing."
G On Oct 13, 2006, at 8:54 AM, Bob W wrote: > Anybody who would like to comment further on this matter must apply in > writing to JCO stating why you think you're qualified to do so. JCO, > this includes you. > > JCO will vet your applications and post a list on his own website of > people who are allowed to comment. I will monitor JCO's list from time > to time, and if your name's not on it I will discount in my own mind > all of your contributions to date. > > Can't say fairer than that. > > -- > Cheers, > Bob > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >> Behalf Of DagT >> Sent: 13 October 2006 08:35 >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> Subject: RE: K1D aperature simulator survey, part Deaux >> >> That's great, so now you are saying that those who are not >> collectors or owners of very old equipment should not have >> the right to wote over the future K-mount. >> >> There's some something strange about this logic. >> >> DagT >> >>> Fra: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> Emne: RE: K1D aperature simulator survey, part Deaux >>> >>> IMHO, anyone who doesn't have at least more than a few ( say 3? ) >>> K/M lenses, especially good ones, shouldn't even be commenting >>> On the matter. Of course you wouldn't care if you don't have >>> A signifigant number of lenses losing key functions. >>> jco > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
