I have this lens with the 67mm filter mount (the first model) in both
the screw and K mount. I don't go anyplace without one of them.
Stopped down to 5.6 they are very sharp. It is heavy, but over the
past 20-30 years, I have gotten used to it. I don't think you can beat
it for the money. I bought one of mine on ebay for $75. The second
edition with the 62mm filter mount is almost as good, but I still
prefer the 67mm model.
On Wednesday 05 September 2001 06:28, Timo Hartikainen wrote:
> I'm going to buy this lens, maybe. I'd like to have some comments on
> it, someone of you probably owns this lens or has used it.
> Somewhere I read that it's quite heavy & big lens..is that true?
> I have now only a 135mm lens in my camera bag and sometimes it's not
> enough.
>
> Hmm.. or if there is some kind of way to make my wife understand that
> I really need something like Pentax 80-200/f2.8 or 300/2.8 ;)
>
>
>
> Timo
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
--
Kenneth Archer + San Antonio, Texas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ #24980801
Powered by Linux ++ Mailed by Kmail
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
