A good lens and very good value if you can get it for under $100. I have it
in both the M42 and K-mounts. A bit on the larger/heavier side but it
balances well with a K body or and older Ricoh. I like the 67mm (1st)
version and the 70-210 2.8~4 (3rd) best. The 62mm 3.5 I tried didn't impress
me as much. I match mine up with a Series 1 28-90 and that is my manual body
zoom collection.
JeffW.
> I'm going to buy this lens, maybe. I'd like to have some comments on it,
> someone of you probably owns this lens or has used it.
> Somewhere I read that it's quite heavy & big lens..is that true?
> I have now only a 135mm lens in my camera bag and sometimes it's not enough.
>
> Hmm.. or if there is some kind of way to make my wife understand that I
> really need something like Pentax 80-200/f2.8 or 300/2.8 ;)
>
>
>
> Timo
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
