Yes it is a strong word. But the strength of the word "never", was modified 
by the words "suspect" and 'likely".



Tom C.


----Original Message Follows----
From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
To: "'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'" <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: A Call to STFU About JCO
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 18:24:23 -0400

I think its wrong to assume that it "never" will be a PENTAX
Or any other brand DSLR. "Never" is a strong word ....
jco

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Tom C
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 5:59 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: A Call to STFU About JCO

Nope, I got these at good prices and they
Are actually worth more than I paid for
Them. I want to USE them fully, not sell them.
jco

---------------

Dear Sir,

You're choice is either to use them fully, as originally designed, on
legacy
bodies, or to still use them, albeit in a different way on the new DSLR
bodies. This has been said already.

No amount of complaining is going to change that.  I suspect you will
likely
never have an aperture simulator in a Pentax DSLR. Therfore your choices
are
narrowed down to this... 1) continue using the lenses with older film
bodies, 2) use them on a new DLSR body accepting the limitations of said

usage, 3) don't use them at all anymore.

Tom C.



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to