No, its just when someone is full of shit I call Them a bullshitter like they are. I don't give A rat's ass how you operate but don't tell me Stupid ass false reasons why. You later changed Your story which just proves you were not Telling the truth of the matter... jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Maas Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2006 11:59 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: K1D aperture simulator, part Three (III)- NOT No, it's not BS. It's why I do it, and it works for me. You're just an ignorant absolutist fuck who can't accept that other people have other opinions and methods. -Adam J. C. O'Connell wrote: > But the REASON you give is total BS, that's why I don't > Understand or believe you. If you want to work like a lunatic > That's up to you but don't give false reasons if you don't > Want to be called out on it. > jco > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Adam Maas > Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2006 9:48 AM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: K1D aperture simulator, part Three (III)- NOT > > Except for the fact that I rarely shoot at slower than f5.6, typically > around f2-4, so iexcessively dark finders isn't an issue. > > I really don't give a flying fuck about how you want to work. I work the > > way that works for me. > > -Adam > > > J. C. O'Connell wrote: >> Yes but its harder to focus which makes it slower not quicker >> Especially at smaller fstops. Most split image and other focus aids >> In the viewfinders don't even work at F5.6 or slower so what >> You are saying makes no sense. Focus will be slower and less >> Accurate, and in low light your be making it harder to compose >> Too. I would never want to work that way. Its much easier to >> To me to just check the DOF if I need to know it which isnt all the > time >> anyway. >> jco >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of >> Adam Maas >> Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 10:50 PM >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> Subject: Re: K1D aperture simulator, part Three (III)- NOT >> >> John, You Ignorant Slut, >> >> It's quicker and I can see what's in focus at all times. Simple as > that. >> Just because you don't, doesn't mean I can't. >> >> -Adam >> >> >> J. C. O'Connell wrote: >>> When the thread title is stupid I am going to comment on it. >>> Secondly why havent you told us WHY WHY WHY you shoot with >>> M42 auto-aperture lenses and bodies stopped down all the time? >>> I don't believe it, either your stupid for doing so or your >>> A liar for saying so unless you have some good explanation >>> For doing so which I simply cant imagine as I am a LONG TIME >>> User of M42 bodies and lenses and that makes no sense whatsoever >>> To me at this point. I'd love to hear your reason for doing so. >>> Maybe there is something I am missing but I cant see it. >>> jco >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf >> Of >>> Adam Maas >>> Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 10:31 PM >>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> Subject: Re: K1D aperture simulator, part Three (III)- NOT >>> >>> What the fuck are you talking about? This thread is about my tendency >> to >>> leave the lens stopped down when shooting, not whatever > nomenclature >>> whinge you're having. >>> >>> -Adam >>> >>> >>> J. C. O'Connell wrote: >>>> Lets fix the nomenclature, Its an APERTURE CAM SENSOR >>>> In my opinion, the word simulator makes no sense at all. >>>> jco >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf >>> Of >>>> Adam Maas >>>> Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 10:14 PM >>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>> Subject: Re: K1D aperture simulator, part Three (III) >>>> >>>> Because it's quick and I always know what's in focus, in fact I kind >>> of >>>> miss that I can't do that with my K and F mount lenses. I was >> shooting >>>> my M645 the same way today, until the light got low enough to need >>>> open-aperture focusing. >>>> >>>> -Adam >>>> >>>> >>>> J. C. O'Connell wrote: >>>>> Bur why when the lenses and bodies have autoapertue that isnt >>>> necessary! >>>>> Seems like a pretty crazy way to operate. WHY??? WHY??? WHY??? >>>>> jco >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf >>>> Of >>>>> Adam Maas >>>>> Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 9:08 PM >>>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>> Subject: Re: K1D aperture simulator, part Three (III) >>>>> >>>>> Quit doubting, I just flat out said it. >>>>> >>>>> I tend to shoot at a stop or two down from wide open, maybe f5.6 at >>>> the >>>>> smallest, so focusing is quite easy with good glass in decent > light. >>>>> -Adam >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> J. C. O'Connell wrote: >>>>>> You view, focus and meter with the lens stopped down all >>>>>> The time? ICKKY. I doubt that. You must mean autoexposure >>>>>> Not autoaperture. >>>>>> jco >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >> Behalf >>>>> Of >>>>>> Adam Maas >>>>>> Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 4:05 PM >>>>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>>> Subject: Re: K1D aperture simulator, part Three (III) >>>>>> >>>>>> Hell, I don't even use auto-aperture function on my M42 lenses > most >>>> of >>>>>> the time on my M42 bodies (yeah, I still shoot with a Chinon CM-3 >> on >>>>>> occasion, and even more rarely with my Spotty). >>>>>> >>>>>> -Adam >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> J. C. O'Connell wrote: >>>>>>> To each his own but I think the loss of auto-aperture >>>>>>> With SMCT lenses is bad or any Pentax K or Canon EOS >>>>>>> Body.. What I was talking about was a DSLR with direct >>>>>>> M42 mount and auto aperture ( but no open apeture AE). >>>>>>> Many of the M42 lenses (even Pentax) are incapable of >>>>>>> Open aperture AE anyway but DO have auto aperture functions >>>>>>> ( like the supertakumars ). >>>>>>> jco >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >>> Behalf >>>>>> Of >>>>>>> Adam Maas >>>>>>> Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 1:49 PM >>>>>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>>>> Subject: Re: K1D aperture simulator, part Three (III) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I would be, given the fact that there are two very good options >> for >>>>>> M42 >>>>>>> users going digital (Canon and Pentax), including full-frame >>> bodies. >>>>>> The >>>>>>> only addition necessary for full M42 support would be the >>> flip-plate >>>>>> for >>>>>>> full-aperture viewing and that's not a big loss. (there are far >> too >>>>>> many >>>>>>> different implementations of full-aperture metering on M42 lenses >>>> for >>>>>>> one to be justifiable to support). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Adam >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> J. C. O'Connell wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I would not be surpised that someday somebody makes a M42 DSLR >>>>>>>> Due to the still tremendous popularity of them particularly the >>>>>>>> Pentax SMC Takumars. They are some of the finest handling lenses >>>>>>>> That's for sure. >>>>>>>> ( not pentax of course ). >>>>>>>> jco >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >>>> Behalf >>>>>>> Of >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Digital Image Studio >>>>>>>> Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 1:32 AM >>>>>>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: K1D aperture simulator, part Three (III) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 13/10/06, Bob Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I regret having added my name to this silly thread. While I >> have >>>>> 10+ >>>>>>>>> high quality, old K & M lenses, I know how to use them on my DS >>>>>>>>> digital. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So I propose a new survey. Why should we stop at asking Pentax >>> to >>>>>>>>> revive the old K & M lenses. Why don't we ask for the old SMC >>>>>>>>> screwmount ones too! Surely they could rig something up handle >>>> the >>>>>>>>> old screwmount actuators. And gee, wow, I've got 10+ high >>> quality >>>>>> old >>>>>>>>> SMC screwmount lenses that would fit right on the camera. I >>> can't >>>>>>>>> wait to try the SMC 85mm f1.8 screwmount on the next flagship! >>>>>>>> No, primarily because it's a totally different mount I guess. >>>>>>>> >> > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
