It's a joke, Shel. Because a few of us have pointed out that the 22-bit signal processor in the K10D is ridiculously over- designed, some people have misinterpreted that statement in all sorts of ways.
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 05:11:46AM -0700, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > I must have missed a few posts. Is it really so that the new Pentax system > is a disappointment? Which experts here have concluded that? Perhaps JCO > worked up some numbers. > > Shel > > > > > Quoting Mark Roberts > > > > I'm sorry Ken but I don't believe a > > word of this. Experts on the PDML > > have counted the incoming photons > > and outgoing electrons and proven > > conclusively that Pentax engineers > > don't know what they're doing and > > that the processing engine of the > > K10D doesn't work. > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
