Doug Brewer wrote: >Tell ya what I plan to do. I plan to get hold of the K10D, look it >over, run it through some field tests, and decide what I like and >don't like about it. Then I'll decide if what I don't like about it >outweighs what I do like about it, and go from there.
Very commendable. I have an even simpler plan: I'm just going to buy it. There's the increased pixel count The built-in shake reduction And the lower minimum ISO And the faster flash sync And the bigger, faster buffer And many other items... But basically my reasoning is that there's just no question that it's going to be better than my ist-D, if for no other reason than it's had several years of Pentax' (and the industry's) technological advancement behind it. And it's going to cost almost FIVE HUNDRED dollars *less* than my ist-D did. How anyone can engage in any hand-wringing at all is a mystery to me. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
