Try learning how to read and understand sometime. Far as I'm  
concerned, any attempt to explain anything to you is like trying to  
instruct a dung beetle how to do higher mathematics.

My statement says the following:
"The automation available for the non-electronic lenses with current  
DSLR bodies is satisfactory for the limited uses that a professional  
expects from them."

Now shut up, fuckface.

G

On Oct 19, 2006, at 11:15 AM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:

> You are contradicting yourself. On one hand you
> Say that "pros" want and or need automation like
> AF or quickshift but on the other hand you say
> They don't need the automation that K/M lenses
> Can provide and has been left of the recent
> DSLR cameras. This, IMHO, makes you full of shit!
>
> jco
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On  
> Behalf Of
> Godfrey DiGiorgi
> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 12:42 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: The JCO survey
>
> On Oct 19, 2006, at 8:17 AM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
>> There is one thing I don't understand about your "pro"
>> Statement, to pros, cameras are just tools. ...
>
> Yes, to a professional photographer, cameras are just tools. One
> changes one's tools as time progresses to obtain the best advantage
> for the work at hand. Most professional shooters will prefer to move
> to the latest glass to take advantage of improvements in lens design
> and coatings, as well as other features like AF and QuickShift,
> rather than harboring an large collection of ancient lenses that pose
> no real advantage to their work. They don't become "attached"
> emotionally to the equipment or a single way of working.
>
> For my needs as a professional photographer, the amount of backwards
> compatibility provided by Pentax is more than adequate. For the
> extremely few, unique lenses that I might desire despite how old they
> are, the current setup works satisfactorily for anything I might
> consider doing with them.
>
> Godfrey


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to