See my last post, it's a fucking lie. I used no such abusive language or manner With him on the ebay deal and went out Of my way to see he was treated fairly Then he Posts that horseshit? Its incredibly Out of line slanderous thing to say About anyone considering what I did For him on that one. If he stated the whole Story it would have been one thing and it Would have been very clear that I gave Him proper service but he didn't and that's The scummy thing about it. I had to defend Myself because of his insane, slanderous remarks. jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Francis Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 2:32 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey What's damaging about it, Tom? As far as I can see all that Shel did was to suggest that JCOs dispute resolution style was to respond with abusive email. Judging by the way he responds on this list to anyone who dares to disagree with him I don't find that claim in any way unbelievable. On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 11:27:26AM -0600, Tom C wrote: > I now read all messages from JCO or containing the characters JCO out of my > junk mail folder. It means I don't have to worry about deleting them from > the inbox. > > However, I would be a little torqued as well at this kind of damaging > remark, especially when the deal had been consumated to both parties > satisfaction. > > Tom C. > > > > ----Original Message Follows---- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey > Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 13:02:37 EDT > > In a message dated 10/24/2006 9:51:28 AM Pacific Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > JCO is an eBay vendor. Vendor reputations are based not only on the > product they sell, but how they deal with customer service issues. If a > vedor treats his custmers like crap ( I am presuming Shel is being > truthful based on JCO's conduct on list), then he has every right (and > perhaps a duty to warn his friends) to tell the world he was badly > treated. > > William Robb > ======== > Personally, I don't think things shared in private email should be shared on > list. It's a basic no-no in Net Etiquette. And I know Shel one time shared > something we had discussed in person, and I thought in private, on list, and > I > didn't appreciate it at all. > > We are getting along pretty well now, so don't take this too personally, > Shel. And I don't want to rehash it either. > > But I think JCO has a perfect right to be thoroughly pissed off. Regardless > regardless of the content of what was shared privately between them. > > Marnie aka Doe > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
