I can certainly understand all those who do use high iso being concerned. Thankfullly I just don't tend to use even 400 on my dl..the noise and image quality suffers to my eye and I rarely have a need for it.
I suspect my K10D will be set on 100 99% of the time. James Quoting Digital Image Studio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 01/11/06, John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I found the response from Joe Tainter to Godfrey's question quite > > illuminating. When asked how he managed back in the film days, he > > seemed to state that basically he rarely if ever used ISO 1600. > > Well in my case I shot at ISO3200 in my 35mm film days quite a bit > and > the results that I could obtain from my *ist D under similar > conditions were far superior to film for my requirements. What I'm > not > looking forward to is having now to take a step back again and lose > potentially a stop or more of sensitivity vs image quality. How much > of a step back will determine how useful the K10D is going to be for > me, the lack of a decent high ISO test images at the moment is > frustrating to say the least. > > -- > Rob Studdert > HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > Tel +61-2-9554-4110 > UTC(GMT) +10 Hours > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ > Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
