How devoid of facts was the Bloomberg article?
Tom C. >From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: Bad news >Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 13:31:38 -0500 > >On 11/8/06, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > He probably can. This report is one little blip on the radar that >contains > > little information with regard to WHY. > > > > They beat their forecasts. Forecasts that they had earlier revised > > downwards. > > > > They had a return to profitability. That's good. Because of camera >sales > > alone, or because of a number of factors including internal cost-cutting > > measures? > >Thank you, Tom. > >I'd very nearly lost faith in the ability of this list to take what >would appear to the rest of the world as good news, and with >conjecture and argument devoid of facts, turn that good news into bad. > >cheers, >frank > >-- >"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >[email protected] >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
