How is telling someone there post misunderstands my contention a provokcation? It isnt. Its a simple discussion on the topic. jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Stenquist Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 1:23 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Using a Super Tak w/ istDS- A challange to the list? I'm sorry, but this is unnecessary provocation. On Nov 11, 2006, at 11:11 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > <ROTFLMAO> What kind of convoluted double-speak is that?! > > Shel > > > JCO wrote: > >> I am saying your wrong in the concept >> of that reply post of yours. Someone >> may think they just disagree but if their concept >> is invalid to my contention than thats another >> matter altogether and I won't just "let it drop" >> because it implies that your post is somehow >> a valid rebuttal/opinion when its not if it is >> irrelavant to my contention. > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
