I was speaking of the reply to your post. On Nov 12, 2006, at 3:29 AM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> How is telling someone there post misunderstands > my contention a provokcation? It isnt. Its a > simple discussion on the topic. > jco > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Paul Stenquist > Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 1:23 AM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: Using a Super Tak w/ istDS- A challange to the list? > > > I'm sorry, but this is unnecessary provocation. > > On Nov 11, 2006, at 11:11 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > >> <ROTFLMAO> What kind of convoluted double-speak is that?! >> >> Shel >> >> >> JCO wrote: >> >>> I am saying your wrong in the concept >>> of that reply post of yours. Someone >>> may think they just disagree but if their concept >>> is invalid to my contention than thats another >>> matter altogether and I won't just "let it drop" >>> because it implies that your post is somehow >>> a valid rebuttal/opinion when its not if it is >>> irrelavant to my contention. >> >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
