On 22/11/06, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I doubt that an outfit like B&H would order or receive only 10 or 20 units
> unless there was a strict allotment from Pentax.  But even if there were,
> I'm sure Pentax would award what is surely one of their largest DSLR
> retailers more than so few K10D's.

Shel, of course it was said in jest, I'm sure they would have received
at least 30 units :-)

We knew that there would be supply issues and after these first
shipments I guess we'll see just how good they are. The camera isn't
available in Australia until the end of the month, why this is I have
no idea, but I'm very sure we'll have greater problems with supply
here then in the US. Our local distribution agency is renown for it.

> Pentax, for the first time in quite some time, has the potential to make
> some real progress, hopefully without backsliding too much.  There was so
> much pentax bashing and teeth gnashing going on here for a while that it
> made me angry and frustrated.

Frankly I think it was well deserved. You seem to have weathered the
storm well but those of us who elected to retain our *ist D bodies
until something that was a real upgrade came out have been left
hanging for some time. Financially Pentax are still dog paddling, as
compared to its major competitors and as such aren't preferred stocks.

-- 
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to