Yep. That's the way to work. My first exposure to digital was with a local pro who was already using ACR with Canon cameras. He talked me into buying the D just after it was introduced. I've never looked back. I'm very pleased with my K10D frames. They look good and respond well to manipulation. Good stuff. Lots of fun. Paul On Nov 23, 2006, at 8:10 PM, Mark Cassino wrote:
> Thanks Paul, Rob, and to all others who replied - it > sounds like the full functionality of ACR remains in > place with DNG, which is what I was wondering about. > Since adopting ACR with the *ist-D a while back my > digital workflow completely changed, with almost all > of the basic post exposure processing being done in > ACR. > > - MCC > > --- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> CS2 works fine with K10D DNG files. That's all I've >> been shooting. >> There is no loss from PEF files. I believe the K10D >> PEF files are >> slightly compressed (lossless), but it's not a huge >> difference. I got >> over 120 exposures shooting DNG on a 2 gig card. The >> pic I posted >> yesterday was from DNG. I'm looking at some others >> now. >> Paul > > > -------------------------- > Mark Cassino Photography > Kalamamazoo, MI > www.markcassino.com > -------------------------- > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > ______________ > Cheap talk? > Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. > http://voice.yahoo.com > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
