Patrice LACOUTURE wrote:
> 2006/11/24, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> If the K10D shot *compressed* DNG then I'd be able to skip
>> the entire batch process. This is what I was hoping for.
>>
>> I'm hoping it's possible for them to provide this functionality
>> eventually through a firmware update, but I have no way of knowing if
>> that part of the camera's firmware is in the flash ROM. If it's not,
>> then it won't be possible for them to change it through a firmware
>> update.
> 
> With Flash prices constantly plumetting down, it's safe for any
> manufacturer to put (almost) everything in Flash. The (small) extra
> cost compared to plain ROM is overcome by greatly reducing the risk of
> a software issue that couldn't be fixed by an upgrade if the piece of
> software was in ROM. Besides, the whole firmware would ideally be
> stored into one single chip, cheaper and safer than two separate ROM
> and Flash chips.
> 
> So my guess is that everything is upgradeable, except maybe the
> bootstrap code that actually allows the flash to be updated in the
> first place (just in case). (This is often stored in Flash, but can't
> be erased after manufacturing by electronic design.)
> 
> The questions are then:
>    - is there any code space left to integrate a compression engine in
> this flash?
>    - how would the DNG compression process impact the performance?
> 
> The obvious workaround for this performance issue is to integrate some
> hardware-assisted compression system (which is common for JPEG) but
> this must be planned in advance and impact the hardware, and the cost.
> 
> Just my educated guess, I may be totally wrong.
> 
> Patrice
> 

The compression engine is already there, it does the PEF compression. 
It's a matter of implementing it for DNG as well. Thus I expect 
compressed DNG via a software update (Unlike on the older bodies which 
lack a compression engine).

Note that such compression engines are often hardware, in the way of a 
dedicated DSP.

-Adam



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to