Listen WR, you complete dumbshit,
Thats not what you said originally, you said
they PROFITED $25-35 by not putting it in
which would be the total cost of implementation,
not just the part cost. Your nuts if you think it
would cost $150-200 retail to add the cam sensor
because all you have to do look at the IS, it sells for only $100 RETAIL
and its a hell of a lot more complex/costly, both
from a hardware and software standpoint.
They have/had ENTIRE SLR cameras with cam sensors
that sell for well under $200.

P.S Go give your boyfried a blowjob
if you are so gay horny you cant stop with the
stupid sexual obscenities...Maybe that will
make you give it up...

jco
--------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
William Robb
Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 5:08 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: RE: Pentax 1.8 85mm



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Whittingham"
Subject: Re: RE: Pentax 1.8 85mm


> For the record, it's several parts, not one. The people at Pentax I've

> heard from estimate that the parts and associated additional assembly 
> complexity add about $25.00-35.00 to the cost of a camera.

For what it's worth, I'd pay the extra $35 for the feature. That's about

£18
GBP, which doesn't buy a whole hell of a lot in the UK. But I doubt it 
will
ever be implemented, I'm glad I can still use my older lenses with the 
K10D
but I've moved on years ago, keeping the "K" series lenses though.


That $35.00 (US currency) is the estimated manufacturing cost per unit 
that I got from a recently retired Pentax rep. In a normal marketplace, 
that would translate to about a $150.00-$200.00 retail cost increase to 
the end user of the equipment.
The retail camera marketplace is too competitive to allow that kind of 
cost increase on consumer level DSLR bodies, which is all Pentax is 
selling at the moment.
Pentax didn't think including it would generate as many sales as having
a lower end user price would. Fuckface will disagree, but his connection
to reality is tenuous at 
best.

William Robb 



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to