Thats NOT all you posted on the topic, you specifically posted they told you they decided to keep the $35 as "profit" too. I dont lie, you are the one lying by telling an obvious half truth here with a partial quote... My memory is better than yours on YOUR posts, maybe it's because you cant remember your own lies?????
jco -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Robb Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 8:49 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: RE: Pentax 1.8 85mm ----- Original Message ----- From: "J. C. O'Connell" Subject: RE: RE: Pentax 1.8 85mm Listen WR, you complete dumbshit, Thats not what you said originally, you said they PROFITED $25-35 by not putting it in Um, you are not only a fuckface, you are a lying homophobic fuckface. From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: The JCO survey Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 22:29:01 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Shel Belinkoff" Subject: RE: The JCO survey >A couple of questions: > > How do you know the part in question costs $5.00? The best information I have recieved is that the manufacturing cost per unit would be closer to US$35.00, and Pentax doesn't believe it is in their best interest to include this feature in their DSLR line. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
