Hey, don't be critical of this kind of experimentation! Some day you 
may want to take a photo of a relatively even toned grey subject at an 
effective ISO of 6400, and then you'll remember this adventurous soul 
(who probably needs to get a life) and you'll realize that you 
shouldn't use more than an effective ISO of 3200. Be kind to those who 
have gone beyond normal photography to artistic exploration of the 
inside of lens caps and grey walls at midnight on a dark night.
(:~]

Stan

On Nov 28, 2006, at 11:57 PM, Mike Hamilton wrote:

> Sometimes (and with increasing frequency), I wonder why I bother
> reading the Pentax forum at DPReview.  Here's a gem from today,
> addressed to Ned Bunnel, Marketing VP for Pentax USA (Edited for
> brevity):
>
> -----------
> "I shoot in the ISO range of 100 to 400, and I have found the color
> and tonal palette in particular to be superb and, in many ways, more
> pleasing to my eyes than any other DSLR I've used before.
>
> However, because there has been some controversy over "banding" at ISO
> 1600 with the K10D, I thought I would run my own experiment.
>
> I invite you or someone else at Pentax to set a K10D to ISO 1600, set
> the exposure compensation to -2 EV, and take pictures of a relatively
> even toned grey subject. If my experience and those of some others is
> typical, you will see fairly distinct vertical (assuming the camera is
> held in landscape mode) pattern noise. There is only the very
> slightest hint of the phenomena at ISO 800, and none at lower ISO
> ratings."
> ----------
>
> Shocking.  Who would think that a camera would produce ugly noise when
> underexposed 2 stops at ISO 1600?  Even more shocking that this user
> would care, given his first statement that he uses the camera in the
> range of 100-400.
>
>
> Mike
> --
> Remember to Breathe -- MichaelHamilton.ca
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to