On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Mike Hamilton wrote: > Shocking. Who would think that a camera would produce ugly noise when > underexposed 2 stops at ISO 1600? Even more shocking that this user > would care, given his first statement that he uses the camera in the > range of 100-400.
Even more ridiculous was the ranting by an user about Pentax not giving a production K10D to Phil for review earlier. He went on to talk something about "obligations of honor" and Pentax being not trustworthy!! I am also surprised how Phil got himself involved in heated debates about not enough Pentax cameras reviews. He has been in this business long enough to know better. He totally lost his cool, declared that he would place K10D last in line for review because of all the moaning, and ended up banning the original poster and removing the thread. -- --Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.vex.net/~lawrence -- --Tungsten T3 Enhanced DIA Keyboard----Nokia Ringtone Convertor-- -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
