On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Jaume Lahuerta wrote: > Why is it more appealing that the K10D?
First of all, I think the K10D (will be) responsible for millions of grins and gazillions (scientific term) of excellent pictures. It is a runaway success for a very good reason: it does what the people want. > Size?, high ISO? > or is one of that obscure Flash functions that you seem to like? ;-) All of the above. To me. I would miss the grip, but judging from the pictures of the K10D grip, it's too big and ugly. I would miss SR, but I am not prepared to go K100D for that. And I would really miss dust-shake, but there ya go. I think (but should see the Digis face-to-face in order to make a meaningful statement, as opposed to opening gambits) that the functional elegance of the MZ-S is still unsurpassed. The K10D looks to me like the PZ-1p, too wide and in your face. Horses for courses. And no, I won't buy your -Ds, it does not shoot film. Kostas (with a serious Barcelona craving at the moment) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
