I have been restraining myself from buying the 16-45 for months now, anticipating the weather-sealed lenses. I had not heard about a 16-50 2.8, which would likely be out of my budget range anyway, and with the rebate it's getting really difficult for me to control my LBA shakes. Is the 16-45 that far head and shoulder above the kit lens? I've been pretty impressed with the kit, but it definitely has its shortcomings.
On Dec 2, 2006, at 7:20 AM, David J Brooks wrote: > Quoting John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 08:11:40PM -0500, David J Brooks wrote: >>> Anyone heard if its happining. >>> >>> I would love to get this lens and the K10d >>> >>> Dave >>> >>> Equine Photography in York Region >> >> >> The new lenses aren't due until March of next year. >> Realistically this probably means I won't be able to get my >> hands on one before my Las Vegas trip in early April :-( > > We are heading there in late April for our 25th wedding anniversary, > so maybe i'll be able to get one by then. > > Dave >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > > > Equine Photography in York Region > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
