On Wed 2001-09-12 (04:34), Ernest Alejandria wrote:
> FYI, war does not have to be declared for an act of war to be committed. And
> I stand by my definition of what constitute an act of war, as stated in my
> prior post quoted above. I can accept that you and others may disagree with
> it but don't tell me to "STOP this" just because you disagree.
Sorry for my plea to stop this. I'm just concerned that this may escalate
too far.
> Frankly, I
> couldn't care less about your own definition of war but I would never tell
> you to STOP it just because I'm indifferent to it.
I don't know your definition of war. Is there any reference?
> As for the innocents, they were already bombed yesterday as they sat in
> their offices at the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.
To me it's a big difference whether a small group does perform a
terror attack or whether a so called democratic state does perform such -
and declare this as their legal rights, since it is in war.
Regards
Martin
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
