You only missed an apostrophe.  Otherwise, what you wrote was perfectly  
correct.

And, of course, you've now missed another apostrophe before "bout".  :-)

John

On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 13:16:06 -0000, Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I said "Johns assumptions are correct."
>
> Kind of incorrect English I believe. Sorry bout that.
>
>
> Tim
> Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of  
> Tim
> Øsleby
> Sent: 16. desember 2006 12:42
> To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
> Subject: RE: K10D review online
>
> Johns assumptions are correct.
> But don't worry Richard. No harm done.
>
>
> Tim
> Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of  
> John
> Forbes
> Sent: 16. desember 2006 04:41
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: K10D review online
>
> On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 03:27:53 -0000, Richard Bellavance
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 2006-12-16 at 00:33 +0100, Tim Øsleby wrote:
>>> Phil is not a jamoke half way around the world. He is a jamoke in my
>>> part of
>>> the world. Hrmp, those Americans.
>>
>> Phil Askey is English.
>
> I suspect Tim knows that.  His tongue in cheek point was that Askey is
> based in London, so he is close to Norway, not half way round the world.
> The American bit was aimed at Shel, and Shel IS American.
>
> You might try lurking for a while before putting your foot in it with
> every post.
>
> John
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to