Same content, still boring. Pretty isn't everything if the content 
sucks. And by-and-large, it does.

-Adam


J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> You are clueless.  NTSC is boring,
> HDTV is not and you dont have to 
> watch "TV SHOWS", there are HD
> movie channels and sports, etc. I guess
> I value movies much more than you
> do, and part of it is propably the fact that
> I can actually see the beauty of what they really
> look like and you still cant.
> jco
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Adam Maas
> Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 2:40 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: It's snowing in hell --OT
> 
> 
> I spend far more time shooting than I do watching TV. I watch maybe 1-2 
> hours a week (mostly Anime Fansubs of stuff currently airing in Japan) 
> and play 1-2 hours a week on the Xbox. I don't have cable as the only 
> show on there I'd watch (Top Gear) isn't worth the cost of a full 
> subscription.
> 
> Why the hell would I pay several grand for a TV I'm never going to use? 
> TV is boring. Go out and shoot.
> 
> -Adam
> 
> 
> J. C. O'Connell wrote:
>> Isnt owning a world class HD home theater worth way more than owning a
> 
>> K10D? (excepting if you are a full time pro photographer and need one 
>> to earn a living), I think it certainly is. How much use do you get
>> of each during the life of the product? I spend way more time watching
>> home theater
>> than I do using cameras. If I had to take only one or the
>> other, they K10D ( or ALL my cameras! ) would go without a second
>> thought.
>> I just couldn't live without HD home theater now. 
>> jco
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf 
>> Of Boris Liberman
>> Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 2:00 PM
>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> Subject: Re: It's snowing in hell --OT
>>
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>>> I applaud Graywolf's economical choice, but I disagree with Adam's 
>>> evaluation of HDTV. I have a 61 inch Pioneer plasma on the wall.
>>> There's a lot of HD broadcast these days. Most of the time I'm  
>>> getting at least 15 HD channels over Direct TV. Today, with football
> 
>>> and the Superfan package, I'm getting all the NFL games in HD. I'm  
>>> watching the Bears of course. But the difference between HD and SD is
>>> substantial. No, it's more than substantial. It's like the difference
>>> between a 2 megapixel point and shoot and a 10 megapixel DSLR. No
>>> comparison. I haven't gone for HD DVD in either format yet. I'll wait
>>> until it's affordable. But like JCO said, standard DVDs upsampled to
>>> 1080i are far better than the same played in low resolution.
>> Let me see, 61 inches... It is more than meter and a half across...
>> Mister Stenquist, you thereby attain the title of the most diagonal of
> 
>> all people whom I have in acquaintance.
>>
>> ;-)
>>
>> I am starting to think about 32 inches of LCD screen, but even this
>> small it will cost me more than brand new K10D ;-).
>>
>> Boris
>>
>>
> 
> 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to