no, Im saying that ntsc poor picture
quality is boring to watch compared
to high fidelity HDTV. This is the
same as a boombox is boring to listen
to compared to a high end audio
system. In high end audio, the term
used instead of boring is "listener
fatigue" with poor fidelity reproduction.
With video, I guess you could call
it "viewer fatigue" but boring is
essentially the same thing, e.g. you
lose interest in what your watching
or in the desired to watch in the
first place.
jco

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Digital Image Studio
Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 5:01 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: It's snowing in hell --OT


On 18/12/06, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You are clueless.  NTSC is boring,
> HDTV is not and you dont have to
> watch "TV SHOWS", there are HD
> movie channels and sports, etc.

So you're saying that a TV technology format is boring? Noise looks
better on HDTV?

-- 
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to