These threads are boring compared to any television format. DagT
Den 17. des. 2006 kl. 23.31 skrev J. C. O'Connell: > no, Im saying that ntsc poor picture > quality is boring to watch compared > to high fidelity HDTV. This is the > same as a boombox is boring to listen > to compared to a high end audio > system. In high end audio, the term > used instead of boring is "listener > fatigue" with poor fidelity reproduction. > With video, I guess you could call > it "viewer fatigue" but boring is > essentially the same thing, e.g. you > lose interest in what your watching > or in the desired to watch in the > first place. > jco > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of > Digital Image Studio > Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 5:01 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: It's snowing in hell --OT > > > On 18/12/06, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> You are clueless. NTSC is boring, >> HDTV is not and you dont have to >> watch "TV SHOWS", there are HD >> movie channels and sports, etc. > > So you're saying that a TV technology format is boring? Noise looks > better on HDTV? > > -- > Rob Studdert -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
