At least I am consistent old TV, old stereo, old cameras. You argue 
anti-digital photography vehemently, and then argue digital TV the same 
way.

Right now I am listening to Doris Day on my 1979 stereo. However I will 
use the modern stuff when it is more convenient and cheaper than the 
old. Retro is fun.

I am neither a believer, nor a disbeliever, just poor. I actually 
couldn't really afford that 15 bucks right now, but sometimes you just 
have to stretch a bit. And you tell me I should have bought a $2000 home 
theater system. <disgusted head shake>



J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> HD isnt just television, it's true home theater.
> A 25 yr old magnavox is just a television though,
> I'll grant you that.
> jco
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> David Savage
> Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 7:41 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: RE: It's snowing in hell --OT
> 
> 
> Television just isn't worth the expense.
> 
> $15 is a good buy.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dave
> 
> At 03:38 AM 18/12/2006, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
>> ARE YOU BLIND? I have been enjoying
>> glorious HDTV for several years now and after
>> the first few months I couldnt even watch
>> the old analog signals anymore. Its incredible and
>> has approx 10 times the resolution of an
>> analog signal on a letterboxed 4:3 screen.
>> Even more if you want to compare to VHS
>> which is too absured to even mention.
>>
>> 1080i format is SIX times rez of DVD format and
>> you cant even get progressive scanning
>> with any old 4x3 sets.
>>
>> You are DEAD WRONG about HDTV being
>> "mostly a scam". Its the greatest
>> home entertainment product of all time
>> IMHO and I cant imagine ever going
>> back to crappy analog, it looks
>> so fake compared to what good HD
>> looks like. Your crediblity has
>> been seriously breached with these
>> comments, thats for sure because
>> these new HDTV sets simply BLOW AWAY
>> anything ever possible on the
>> old NTSC sets with analog signals.
>> Its not just defintion either, they
>> have better contrast range, less
>> electronic artifacts, less luminance
>> and chromanace noise, better color
>> accuracy, better color gamut, and
>> better sound too. Its a "blowout"
>> compared to ntsc.
>>
>> jco
> 
> 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to