John, Interesting situation. I will try to repeat your experiment this afternoon.
Did you use the built-in NR? When you say "processed PIF", do you mean you shot raw (as PEF), and developed it with Photo LAB? Did you do any further post-processing, eg. contrast enhancement? Jostein On 12/18/06, John Celio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Take a look at the sky in this pic. (it's a processed PIF, so you can open > it in photoshop if you want to see the exif info) > > http://www.neovenator.com/special/__IGP0101.jpg > > I was doing some city shots of San Francisco from Treasure Island last night > with my K10D. Lens was M* 300mm f4. ISO was 200, aperture was f8, exposure > was ten seconds. > > The streaky noise in the sky in that shot will almost definitely be visible > in a print. This worries me, because I was planning on recreating my San > Francisco panorama from a couple years ago. I shot that thing with 20 > second exposures but didn't get noise like this. > > Aside from wondering if perhaps something is wrong with the sensor (this is > me jumping to conclusions, which I desperately try not to do), I'm wondering > if perhaps shooting at a higher ISO and shorter exposure would produce > better results. > > Any thoughts? > > John > > -- > http://www.neovenator.com > http://www.cafepress.com/neovenatorphoto > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
