John, I think you'll find that most of the posts you send , or those that simply make mention of you (like this one), will find it's way into more and more trash cans.
You're correspondence technique, has left a bitter taste in many peoples mouths. Because of it, anything you say, no matter how technically accurate or valid, will simply be ignored & disregarded. And this has nothing to do with being abusive or name calling. When someone states an opinion, or a preference, and you reply by saying "WRONG, WRONG, WRONG", it's you who comes across as unpleasant. Opinions & personal preferences in particular, can't be wrong, they just are. It's a shame really, you seem like a smart guy. It's just you appear to be unable to play nicely with others. Cheers & Happy Holidays, Dave At 10:44 AM 19/12/2006, J. C. O'Connell wrote: >Secondly, if someone wants to comment on my latest posts, >I suggest they be able to read them and then read them first. >Its not very smart to say you have >had it with me, will not read any of my posts, and then proceed to >continue >posting new stuff related to me and my posts speculating on what I "may" >or "may not" >have just posted recently isnt it? I think someone should either read >my new posts or just shut up about them and me completely. To continue >posting >about them, while not actually reading them, makes no sense whatsoever. >This is one of the reasons I havent ever filtered anyone in my life. >If you filter them out, you really have no business commenting later >because you are totally in the dark with regards to what has been >discussed. >jco -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
