The main argument at the moment is SR, as it is in the K100/10D, wouldn't work. Supposedly current full frame Pentax lenses projected image circle wouldn't be large enough to cover the moving sensor.
As some people think that SR is more useful than a FF sensor, that's their reason for thinking Pentax FF is a pipe dream. Time will tell. Cheers, Dave P.S. Welcome. On 12/21/06, Tom Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi: > > Im kinda' new here, but one of the things I picked up in passing is that > the K-mount might be fundamentally incompatible with a full-frame DSLR? > Or did I miss something? If I didnt, please explain to me what the issue > is, as I was under the impression that if you put a sensor the size of a > 35mm frame in the same place in reference to the lens as a 35mm frame of > lens, it would all work out just peachy. Why not? I hope not, as I am > hoping that the bigger sensor will give the quantum physicists more to > work with to give us all the resolution we can eat AND bring dynamic > range more in line with film. From my understanding, this is likely an > either/or proposition with an APC sensor. Cant have both. > > TIA > -Tom in SC > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
