Yes, I am serious, that I have all this glass and more, if that is what you mean ? or if you mean, am I thinking of selling ??, I am leaning toward it, because if Pentax is going and there will be no pro digital body,something like a digital LX, but better, I will stick with Nikon. I worked as a photojournalist for the last 26 years for a newspaper and I used my own equipment up until 2001(because I had better glass than the paper) when the paper when digital with D1's and Nikon Glass......
At 08:03 PM 12/23/06, you wrote: >j are you serious or pulling out legs? > >A135/1.8 - $1,500+ >A15/3.5 - $650+ >K18/3.5 - $350+ >A16/2.8 fisheye - $350+? >A200/4 Macro - $1,100+ >K1000/11 Reflex - ??$750+?? > >Regards, Bob S. > >On 12/23/06, j <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Couple others I have are 135 F1.8, 15 F3.5, 18 > > F3.5, 16 F2.8 fish, 17 F4.0 fish, 200 F4.0 macro, > > 1000mm mirror..What do you think they are worth ? Thanks > > > > At 02:54 PM 12/23/06, you wrote: > > >Bob, you're not helping here:-)). > > >Paul > > >On Dec 23, 2006, at 2:39 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote: > > > > > > > A85/1.4 - $1,000+ or FA85/1.4 - $750 > > > > K200/2.5 - $500+ > > > > A200/2.8 - $750+ > > > > A300/2.8 - $1,500+ > > > > M300/4 - $500+ > > > > A50/1.2 - $350+ > > > > K105/2.8 - $250+ > > > > > > > > Totals something more than US$5,000 I would guess... > > > > Regards, Bob S. > > > > > > > > On 12/23/06, j <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Ok, what is a 85 f1.4, 200 F2.5, 200 F2.8, 300 > > > >> F2.8, 300 F4.0 M, 50 F1.2. 105 F 2.5 worth. These > > > >> are some of my many pieces of glass that comes to > > > >> me without looking in the boxes ??? > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> At 02:50 PM 12/22/06, you wrote: > > > >>> Dave show some compassion to a brother in distress. Jay I'll > > > >>> offer you > > > >>> £100 sterling although obviously at that price you would have to pay > > > >>> the postage! > > > >>> > > > >>> Peter > > > >>> > > > >>> On 12/22/06, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>>> What have you got? > > > >>>> > > > >>>> I may be interested in taking some of it off your hands, It > > > >>>> shouldn't > > > >>>> be worth much. I'd say AU$100 for the lot > > > >>>> > > > >>>> :-) > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Dave > > > >>>> > > > >>>> On 12/22/06, j <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>>>> SO what does everyone think, is it time to unload all my high end > > > >>>>> Pentax glass, as I still have not bought a digital body in the > > > >>>>> Pentax > > > >>>>> brand, however I do have a Nikon D1x and D100..What do you > > > >>>>> think ??? jay > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> -- > > > >>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > > >>>>> [email protected] > > > >>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > >>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> -- > > > >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > > >>>> [email protected] > > > >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >>> -- > > > >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > > >>> [email protected] > > > >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > > >> [email protected] > > > >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > > > [email protected] > > > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > > > >-- > > >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > >[email protected] > > >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >[email protected] >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
