That should be: Inspecting the 2400 print with reading glasses... Paul On Dec 27, 2006, at 10:36 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Well, one wouldn't expect it with a new printer. But I knew it had > been a display model. Should have thought of that right off. In any > case, I printed a gang sheet that I had printed on the 2200 just a > couple of days ago. Inspecting the 2500 print with reading glasses > showed it to have slightly better sharpness. More importantly, the BW > frames were much cleaner. No color cast whatsoever. I'm very pleased. > Paul > On Dec 27, 2006, at 10:17 PM, David Savage wrote: > >> Excellent. >> >> I should have thought of that, as I had a blocked nozzle last week. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Dave >> >> >> >> On 12/28/06, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I solved it. The printer I bought was a display model. (I got it for >>> a very good price, considering it was from a retail camera store.) >>> The ink had been loaded some time ago. And the nozzles were clogged. >>> A nozzle cleaning made everything perfect. Just made a beautiful >>> print. I'm a happy man. Thanks for your help. >>> Paul >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
